Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : HITSGALORE.COM (HITT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mighty_Mezz who wrote (4617)	10/31/1999 7:55:00 PM
From: TideGlider	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7056

Yeah! Why not take some of those profits LFT is making. I think it will be a floorless as Zeev would say. <<GG>> Why on earth would anyone give them good terms? TG

To: Mighty_Mezz who wrote (4617)	11/1/1999 10:32:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7056

HITT has only 796,840 shares of common left to issue from the total authorized. If they do a PP with convertible preferred, look out below! Thanks for the reminder; I'd forgotten how little authorized they had left. They were gonna take a vote on increasing it, weren't they, lolol? Something else has occurred to me. Last night a poster at RB asked when the first LFT announcement was made with relation to the appearance of the first Bloomberg article. As we know, the LFT announcement came out on the 10th, the Bloomberg article on the 11th. Might it be that the LFT PR was released prematurely, with the hope that it'd deflect attention from the Bloomberg piece? HITT knew that an article was in the works; the reporter noted that "Reed refused to be interviewed when asked for comment". So did the Bloomberg investigations force HITT's hand? Were they forced to throw together that looney LFT deal in a rush?