SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCH Technologies (DCH) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Stichnoth who wrote (2119)11/1/1999 11:10:00 PM
From: Dan B.  Respond to of 2513
 
Well, you have a point there, LOL.

I just now simply searched by Number from the filing, in the site you provided. Hope this helps.

Patent No: 5,514,486

164.195.100.11

and Patent No: 5,595,834:

164.195.100.11

"Inventors:
Wilson; Mahlon S. (Los Alamos, NM)
Assignee:
The Regents of the University of California, Office of Technology (Alameda, CA)"--same for both. The following is from 5,514,486 and I see that the other more recent patent reads only slightly different and mostly verbatim as regards this quote.

"The application of a diffusion process for the oxygen supply acts to limit the supply to the active sites, which limits the reaction.
The porous flow-field also limits the outward diffusion of the reaction product water, thus minimizing water loss and drying
effects on the cell. Since each molecule of oxygen diffusing inward produces two water molecules that diffuse outward at
steady-state conditions, it will be appreciated that the cell design allows the influx of sufficient oxygen while limiting the escape
of water vapor such that the system maintains the desired high hydration level. In addition, the absence of manifold seals at the
periphery of all but the anode flow-fields and separator plates extending beyond the unit cell periphery to function as cooling
fins, allow greater conduction of reaction heat to the periphery to enhance cooling. In addition, the diffusion delivery of the
reactants allows the performance of the cells to be relatively tolerant of stack orientation.

In terms of manufacturing advantages, all of the components of the stack, such as the flow-fields and seals, are radially
symmetrical so fabrication and modifications are simple. In addition, this configuration provides a highly efficient utilization of the
cross sectional area and smaller and lighter end-plates. Thus, the size of the complete fuel cell stack is less than might be
obtained with more conventional designs."

Dan B