SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mani1 who wrote (78221)11/2/1999 2:44:00 AM
From: Process Boy  Respond to of 1571929
 
Mani - <LOL PB, you sure took exception to my statement that he was.>

Yes, I did.

<I apologize and stand corrected, "lying" was not the proper term.>

Thank you, and accepted.

PB




To: Mani1 who wrote (78221)11/2/1999 2:53:00 AM
From: Goutam  Respond to of 1571929
 
Mani,

I haven't seen this tidbit posted here. Intel's lawsuit against Via - it's getting very interesting day by day. These turn of events may come to benefit AMD in one form or the other. FIC seems not very thrilled with Intel expanding the lawsuit to include FIC, and contemplating of counter-suing Intel. Hope they'd see the other objectives of Intel behind the lawsuit against Via and counter them too.

From aceshardware.com ______________________

VIA to Intel: No Checkmate Just Yet KH Yeap
Monday, November 01, 1999 (10:44 PM Pacific Standard Time)
Interesting news bit from Ctech Taiwan : VIA may have a counter-offensive against Intel's latest round of
lawsuit after all. Remember VIA has already tapped NSM's cross-licensing with Intel and producing
APPP-133A under the umbrella of NSM? Well, looks like VIA has another resource to tap: S3. According
to the Ctech report, S3 CEO Ken Potashner has alread arrived in Taiwan for a close talk with VIA's
president about the co-operation between S3 and VIA, with particular focus on Promedia-II integrated
chipset. Now comes the interesting part: S3 and VIA may spin off a new company to market the integrated
chipset, which will be "techinically" owned by S3. Since S3 has a cross-licensing with Intel, where S3
obtained the right to Intel's bus technologies for the next 10 years in exchange for supplying Intel with
AGP4X technology, this new integrated chipset will be techinically immuned from any Intel lawsuit. And VIA
will not have to pay any royalty to Intel for that.

In a related Ctech report , FIC has expressed its dissatisfaction against Intel's latest act of expanding the
lawsuit against VIA to include FIC. FIC is reported as saying that Intel's lawsuit is "unjust and unfounded"
because they are not the only company that makes motherboards based on VIA's chipset. Perhaps FIC
has forgotten that they are so far the only company that officially sells and supports a K7 motherboard? ;).
In any case, FIC is allegedly considering a counter-suit against Intel

aceshardware.com ______________________

Regards,
Goutama