Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jean1057 who wrote (15616)	11/2/1999 12:32:00 PM
From: Bruce A. Thompson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

Jean Claude, Since you are a name caller, I will respond again. I, Like some others , am waiting for this pig to announce a PO before I invest. Meanwhile, I have to put up with idiots like you who take my posting of quotes from the most recent prospectus as declaring I am short. I am not short. I don't care for your accusation. I beleive you are a shill for CC and are only trying to create the hype to entice fools to part with their money. The prospectus says it all: We are a development stage company and cannot anticipate when, or if, we will ever have significant revenues from a product. We have derived our revenues primarily from a research and development contract with Delphi Automotive Systems Group, which we completed in May 1998. We presently have limited quantities of commercially developed and manufactured products available for sale. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. BT

To: jean1057 who wrote (15616)	11/2/1999 2:04:00 PM
From: MGV	Respond to of 27311

One observation and one question for you pallisard and pfister. First, I think you guys too often confuse a boilerplate disclaimer with a statement of fact regarding business status. Your position seems to be that if it is in a filing and it is negative, then it is a disclaimer. And if it is a disclaimer, well, disclaimers are to be ignored. Second, is it your position that both disclaimers and negative statements of fact on business condition/status are to be ignored or given little consideration?