Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Dalglish who wrote (47013)	11/2/1999 11:30:00 AM
From: marginmike	Respond to of 152472

Why on earth should we listen to you? You have already made several statements that have been refuted? yet you refuse to suport your views? Bill in the last two years baisicly everything Q management has said has been accurate. whille companies like IDC, ERICY, and MOT talk through their asses. Your agenda is transparent, please take your spam elsewhere. We do not want to go to your techstockpropaganda.com sight. Please nobody here wants to hear your lies, and rhetoric.

To: Bill Dalglish who wrote (47013)	11/2/1999 11:37:00 AM
From: 16yearcycle	Respond to of 152472

Look, this is terrible! If Qcom said that ERICY has to pay the same royalties on w-cdma and cdma, are we supposed to discount that? Meanwhile, you are clearly pimping your investment! Take a moment and think about how we see you right now.

To: Bill Dalglish who wrote (47013)	11/2/1999 11:42:00 AM
From: Uncle Frank	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 152472

Bill, You make sounds like an informed rational investor. But over the last 48 hours you've fed the thread a mixture of techno-babble, fud, and spam, which doesn't agree with my digestion. I state in my profile that I try to seek the kernel of knowledge in every intelligent poster's position, and use it to grow my personal wealth. I'm going to make an exception in your case, because I think self interest in growing your website has clearly distorted your objectivity and the value of your analyses. You may well become my test case for the new <IGNORE> feature of the SI. Prosperous investing, Uncle Frank