Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kelly who wrote (4597)	11/2/1999 12:07:00 PM
From: JDN	Respond to of 10293

Dear Kelly and all: In fairness of presentation I agree. I own a biotech stock that has been VERY successful in bringing out products such as the widest used drug in treating AIDS a super drug for treating hepatitus BUT they signed an agreement with GLAXO which resulted in much of the profits being siphoned off to GLAXO so stock hasnt done anything for me. However, going forward now that they are financially strong they are attempting to wean themselves from GLAXO and market and distribute their FUTURE drugs themselves. Much riskier but if they are successful stock SHOULD move. I never took the time to really understand the GUMM/GELTECH relationship but if I were a serious investor in GUMM I would want to make sure that I understood it well. JDN

To: Kelly who wrote (4597)	11/2/1999 1:42:00 PM
From: Mike M	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

You trash Bill for being abrasive: well, it's not quite too late to set a better example. Message 11773298 Message 11772358 Message 11760501 Message 11619870 Kelly, He's not abrasive as much as he is a liar and a manipulator. He says anything that comes to his head to accomplish his willful purpose without regard to whom he might hurt. He has no insight, no evidence and no conscience.... When he shuts up about GUMM you won't hear from me. I haven't a clue why anyone would want to spend a minute on this thread other than to refute his defamation.