Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Sideware Systems - SYD.u/V, SDWSF -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KrisCo who wrote (4355)	11/2/1999 3:41:00 PM
From: KrisCo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6076

And That Is Of Course...IMO eom Kris

To: KrisCo who wrote (4355)	11/2/1999 9:18:00 PM
From: MAKAMAI	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6076

Aloha Kris... I posted this on SH, but it didn't generate much discussion. Since you eluded to it, thought I'd post it here. IMO, (not at the expense of over simplifying) when a stock price rapidly rises, it does so based on volume. Now that we will be trading on two exchanges, which basically work independently during the trading day, won't we be diluting the volume from that which we would have had if we were trading on only one exchange alone? Seems like it would be in SYDs best interest to abandon the VSE once SDWSF is fully up and running to minimize this effect and maximize the stock price. (Note: I'm not taking into consideration other reasons for jumping off the VSE. Just addressing this one particular issue.) For example, we may not see the same kind of volume on the VSE that the MMs are accustomed to when we have had rapid price increases, because much of the trading will be diverted to the OTC-BB. This could result in the stock price not advancing as high as quickly. Your's or anyone's thoughts on this would be appreciated. Mahalo, Makamai