SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: chuckj who wrote (47405)11/3/1999 12:11:00 AM
From: Boplicity  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
please go do some more homework before you post again..

G



To: chuckj who wrote (47405)11/3/1999 12:13:00 AM
From: DWB  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
chuckj

I remember you.. you used to plague this thread on occasion back when I owned Ericsson last year... dang.. you were embarrassing then, and obviously haven't changed since. You get the honor of being the second idiot relegated to the IGNORE button for today...

DWB



To: chuckj who wrote (47405)11/3/1999 12:28:00 AM
From: Caxton Rhodes  Respond to of 152472
 
Chuckie- Glad to have you back. Your insight has made us all rich! So where are you and Zippie living?

Cheers,

Caxton



To: chuckj who wrote (47405)11/3/1999 12:30:00 AM
From: Dalin  Respond to of 152472
 
LOL...get a life! Where did you dig that garbage up? Or did you make it up yourself?

D.



To: chuckj who wrote (47405)11/3/1999 12:33:00 AM
From: r.edwards  Respond to of 152472
 
Chuck I'll sell you my nov200 calls for $6000 each....? <maybe>



To: chuckj who wrote (47405)11/3/1999 12:35:00 AM
From: Augustus Gloop  Respond to of 152472
 
Well, I for one am glad to own a little of this low margin company that is run by turkeys with the help of government corruption.



To: chuckj who wrote (47405)11/3/1999 12:51:00 AM
From: Jon Koplik  Respond to of 152472
 
Chuckie - I think I replied to you about a year ago something along the line of : If you really believe what you are posting, sell short a whole bunch of Qualcomm for your own account. I will remain long Qualcomm for my own account. And, we will check in with each other in a year or two.

So, did you "take your own advice" ?

Jon.



To: chuckj who wrote (47405)11/3/1999 1:16:00 AM
From: JGoren  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
You haven't changed. The last time you showed up on this thread, you said:
To: +engineer (16943 )
From: +chuckj Thursday, Oct 22 1998 11:30AM ET
Reply # of 47436

Quslcomm means:

loser company, loser management, loser products, loser stadium, and loser teams.


Since your last post, most of the folks who were on this thread last October have made over a million dollars. The Quillionaires thank you. Ha ha. Have you done better?



To: chuckj who wrote (47405)11/3/1999 2:06:00 AM
From: Bux  Respond to of 152472
 
Hey Chuckj, what a surprise to see you here! It looks like you have missed out on a lot of the fun and exciting things that have been going on since you left. I think I should help bring you up to speed. Let's start with your latest post.

Revenue year over year has increased by 14%

Wrong.

stock has multiplied 10 folds.

Wrong, more.

All of their increased profits are from cost cutting.

Wrong.

They are in a low margin commodity business for phone chips

Wrong.

they have just as many patents on CDMA as Mot, and lucent,

More.

and they just traded some patent claims with ERICY, so the only royalties they receive are from the Koreans.

Wrong.

On their own these turkeys could not make a phone for profit even if they were handed the to them by Mot to relabel.

Wrong.

CDMA is still an unreliable tech,

Wrong.

they only sell it in the third world countries who they can buy the government officials with the help of the corrupt Clinton Administration.

Wrong.

In the heart of the hi tech world in San Jose CA, you will have to strain to find a CDMA phone.

Wrong.

If you want to buy a low margin business that is cheap look at SIII, these guys sell tens of millions of graphics chips per quarter real cheap.

I don't know but why would I want a low margin business?

Furtheremore with the criminals in the Clinton Government handing over the PCS frequencies to CDMA they have created a standards war that will set back IP based car radios/computers and IP wireless portable computers for years until a standard wins, meanwhile qualcomm has to wait.

Wrong.

No ISP is going to invest in wireless until these spec issues are resolved.

Wrong.

Just look at what happend to USRX when they were going the way of X2 while Ascend was shipping K56FLEX. For a period of one year no one was buying access equipment and that lead to their demise.

Wrong.

The same went with the USRX's X2 and Lucent and Mot's K56flex PC modems--aLL big business put off buying PCs until the spec was settled.

Wrong.

Chuckj, with all the wrong answers, one might conclude that I edited your post heavily. Wrong. It's all there. You were wrong last year when you used to visit and tell us that QCOM was a terrible investment, your tune hasn't changed, and you are still wrong.

Bux



To: chuckj who wrote (47405)11/3/1999 6:07:00 AM
From: 100cfm  Respond to of 152472
 
you've been watching too many reruns of mel gibson's conspiracy movie.
and also you don't know what the hell your talking about.