SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Whodunit? Two Stockbrokers Murdered in Jersey; No Clues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rascal who wrote (601)11/3/1999 2:19:00 PM
From: jhild  Respond to of 1156
 
I originally recall reading it was 10 acres, then 16 acres was the report.

I understand that the gate was open, but I have no idea if it was ornamental (always open) or whether there was an ability to monitor and control entrance to the estate. From the sounds of things, I think it was likely always open. But that is purely my guess.



To: Rascal who wrote (601)11/4/1999 12:27:00 AM
From: Sarkie  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1156
 
I read the house was on 17 acres. Neighbors wouldn't hear anything. Does anyone know if I am right about that? I remember that a gate had to be opened for entrance to the estate.

Wasn't it a neighbor that saw a vehicle drive up with the ex husband and Kimberly's father and others. If this is the case then the house is at least in view of a neighbor.

~Sarkie


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News