Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: eddie r gammon who wrote (70040)	11/3/1999 6:34:00 PM
From: Joan Osland Graffius	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 132070

erg, >>he at least works for them. So I think you are close to right (g) I have watched his posts on SI since he become a member. <ggg> Joan

To: eddie r gammon who wrote (70040)	11/3/1999 8:11:00 PM
From: AurumRabosa	Respond to of 132070

Process Boy is another person that claims to be an Intel employee and member of the Coppermine Development Team. Funny though, they don't use their Process.Boy@intel.com address. Try sending email to john.hull@intel.com and see what he says. He may have a middle initial but then in 27 tries you'd know for sure if one doesn't come back undeliverable. I bet Intel policy states that it's grounds for immediate dismissal when employees discuss Intel business in public. So, are they so desperate that they feel they need to hype INTC so their employee stock options will be worth more? Where are they coming from to risk getting fired just so they can chit chat with all us common folk. Or, are they really shills for Intel management and have their perspective carefully sculpted. Either way it reeks, I'm buying INQ puts.