Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AurumRabosa who wrote (91650)	11/3/1999 8:25:00 PM
From: Robert Salasidis	Respond to of 186894

Beats giving a stronger statement and then getting class action suit filed against them. We've seen this scenario with other companies in the past, and I don't think we need to spread the Intel wealth among law firms as opposed to long term investors.

To: AurumRabosa who wrote (91650)	11/3/1999 8:33:00 PM
From: John Hull	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

did you forget to take your pill today? regards, jh

To: AurumRabosa who wrote (91650)	11/3/1999 10:25:00 PM
From: Brian Malloy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Ron, You still didn't answer my last post? I feel slighted. Message 11748188 You said INTC was going to $54 and now it is just about $80 and this happened in a week. Now we are to believe that you made a lot of money on INTC puts? Just to ensure that you get all the credit you are do in the future, please post your INTC trades after you make them on this thread. In that way we can watch you finese this Bear Market we are in. By the way how do you account for the NASDAQ breaking 3,000 Regards,

To: AurumRabosa who wrote (91650)	11/4/1999 12:18:00 AM
From: Amy J	Respond to of 186894

RE: "Now we have HWP, IBM and DELL saying that Taiwan parts shortages will materially impact sales, but, Intel managers very carefully word their response to the same question as 'we'll meet all our orders.'" Ron, I listened to the CC and they said they were not impacted by the Quake. Intel speaks about their business - they are not industry spokespersons for HWP, IBM, and Dell. Also, Intel makes chips, not computers. RE: "They also say that Y2K will not impact Intel operations. That needs some clarification" I listened to the CC and it was very clear to me. Specifically, they said Y2k is alive and well, with some buyers delaying purchases, some buyers increasing purchases, but the net Y2k impact is a wash (i.e. X - X = 0 ) on Q4 as they currently see it. RE: "Intel management worded it to imply that Y2K-induced order deferrals will not impact Intel sales but it will. I think Intel officers have lost a lot of credibility this year with their word-smithing approach to informing investors" If your comment pertains to Intel's Qtr CC, then it is incorrect because I heard the call and they said it will not impact sales overall. They DID say some will buy more (X) and some will buy less (X). X-X=0 impact on sales. Net Impact is Zero per their discussion in the CC: Message 11527549 "- Both stories of Y2K are alive and well from our customers [i.e. those who buy now vs. those who buy later], therefore we're seeing normal growth" Amy J