SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (32187)11/3/1999 9:07:00 PM
From: John Madarasz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
Sounds like CONVICTION to me...

next stop...complacency and wishful thinking...

Best Regards,

JM



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (32187)11/3/1999 10:24:00 PM
From: Rambi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
I gave up and moved some of my sidelined money back into mutual funds last week. I don't know whether this qualifies as another capitulating bearess, but I've held off for a year, missed a a LOT of money, and can't justify sitting on it any longer. I offer this as evidence of---- something. I"m ready to move it out again quickly!



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (32187)11/4/1999 5:38:00 AM
From: bearshark  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
GZ:

Throughout October, the high level of volume never ceased. As long as that volume was there, there was the opportunity for a resumption of the bull trend. I do not think we have seen the real breakout day yet. I expect that to be shown with about 1.3 to 1.5 billion NYSE shares traded on that day. (Of course, I would expect a final reversal day to look similar in volume.)

When the bear comes, no one will notice. It will be the end of SI because many of the novices will go bust. The bear, in successive rounds, will take their money. It will be marked by a key reversal day and the end of volume. People will quietly throw in their towels over a period of time and it will be over.

I wish I had more time now to play but I have other endeavors. You know all these things but I just wanted to post a note.

Of course, I am long.



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (32187)11/4/1999 9:09:00 AM
From: pater tenebrarum  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 99985
 
GZ, i agree. we should at least continue higher into expiration. the NAZ and NYSE short positions were at record highs last month and the the number of open call contracts is near record highs as well. this means that short covering and delta hedging alone could drive us quite a bit higher still. what's more, the next ST cycle peak (or rather turning point) coincides with expiration day, and the FOMC does as well. i'm basically of the opinion that since valuations have long ago lost any discernible relationship with fundamentals, there is in fact no upside limit to the market based on that. this is to say that e.g. a total market cap of 180% of GDP would be equally meaningless as the current 160% (just as an example...the same can be said for most other traditional yardsticks), or to take a certain stock as an example, if a company(SCMR) with 11,5 million in revenues and 21,5 million in losses is valued at 18 billion dollars on promise alone, it could just as well be valued at 20 billion dollars. as mentioned in a recent post to Lee, the market is now driven by it's own inner dynamic, essentially divorced from reality. therefore, it can go much higher still...not forever of course, and in all likelihood the end of the bull market will be swift and will be perceived as a catastrophic event, but the limits dictated by rational fundamental analysis have been removed.
so i agree with you...there's more to come. note also that rate hikes by both the BoE and ECB today have led to a big rally in S&P futures, so the market is not even stopped by the danger of liquidity drying up. it will be at some point in the future, as fundamentals reassert themselves always over time, but not now.

regards,

hb