Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: chester lee who wrote (4638)	11/4/1999 2:26:00 AM
From: Bill Wexler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

The GUMM stock fraud. Now I've seen everything. One bunch of crooks pushing quack medicine pointing an accusing finger at another set of crooks pushing the same quack medicine...the only difference being that you squirt the quack medicine up your nose. GUMM gamblers should take a good look at QGLY's stock price...and the future.

To: chester lee who wrote (4638)	11/4/1999 7:42:00 AM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

My, my, if that isn't a case of the pot calling the kettle black. Regards, Barb

To: chester lee who wrote (4638)	11/4/1999 10:50:00 AM
From: Druss	Respond to of 10293

Chester--Just for a moment let us leave all of GUMM's claims behind. <<The Quigley Corporation cannot understand the attempt to promote a study that has never been published.>> They can't be serious! These people are listed on the stock exchange and allowed to run a company and be trusted with shareholders money? If Quigley would like to know what is going on they can contact me. For a few dozen K a month I will explain these things to them. All the Best Druss