Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Hull who wrote (91683)	11/4/1999 11:14:00 AM
From: Burt Masnick	Respond to of 186894

John - Bravo. Burt

To: John Hull who wrote (91683)	11/4/1999 11:42:00 AM
From: Michael Bakunin	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 186894

Any idea why Andy Bryant (CFO) told Merrill, over breakfast, that Intel is "struggling to keep up with strong demand"? Aside from worries about selective disclosure, it seems odd that a company that prides itself on its execution would admit to struggles here. -mb

To: John Hull who wrote (91683)	11/4/1999 12:13:00 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

John - Re: Wrong Starr & "I congratulate you if, in fact, you've done well on your speculations in the last month. If you've got it all figured ..." Why would this bozo be all torqued-off over Intel and their supposedly poor management if in fact he was PROFITING from these Intel mis-steps ? Indeed, if he was profiting from all these supposedly "missed estimates", I think he'd be pleased as punch at Intel's "stumbling" - and panting for more of the same. My conclusion is that he's all bent out of shape because he has SUFFERED financially from Intel's performance - NOT PROFITED from it - as Intel's stock has refused to go dwon and stay down. Paul