Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hank who wrote (4654)	11/4/1999 8:43:00 PM
From: DanZ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

<You can bet I'm going to have the medical library get me a copy and I and my colleagues will rip it apart.> Rip it apart? Now that sounds like an open-minded way to approach the article LOLOL. I can picture it now. Hank finds a flaw in the article and stomps up and down. Meanwhile, the second study comes out positive, more PR for Zicam results, more stores sell out of Zicam, and the stock continues to soar.

To: Hank who wrote (4654)	11/4/1999 10:11:00 PM
From: Mike M	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

PS- I can't WAIT for that AJIC article to come out. You can bet I'm going to have the medical library get me a copy and I and my colleagues will rip it apart. Hank, that's a good idea. Please insure you do a thorough job. We need double spacing and one inch margins and plenty of footnotes. Footnotes are important. Try to use as many monosyllables as possible. Be gentle on us poor bulls, well, as gentle as you can. We will be waiting with baited breath and will, of course, give the report the same level of credibility that we gave the "Hank test" as we have fondly grown to know it..... Oh, perhaps you might even submit your finding to the NEJM for publication. I suspect that would be a great forum to present your fair and unbiased treatise. The only problem being we wouldn't get to see it until publication. Well, until then.