SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: axial who wrote (5849)11/5/1999 6:42:00 AM
From: Rehan Mahmud  Respond to of 12823
 
Jim: I think the answer maybe that no one may know the correct answer. OFDM appears to be an esoteric field of wireless transmission protocols. Hatim and Michael Fattouche may belong to a small group who truly understand this area. They certainly have worked on this problem long enough. The facts are that as owners of WIN, we are in the game. Phillips, Telia, and Tele-UK have paid good money for this technology. All these me-too wannabe's are popping out of the woodwork... that has to be a bullish sign. cheers. rehan.



To: axial who wrote (5849)11/5/1999 1:07:00 PM
From: Bernard Levy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12823
 
Hi Jim:

Fered Dawson's take on VOFDM:

multichannel.com

The article plays up the BRCM connection.
However, I will reiterate that TI is probably
better placed than any other chip maker to
implement VOFDM because OFDM is so close to
DMT (the connection here is that TI purchased
Amati Communications 2 years ago, which was the
leader in the development of full rate ADSL
based on DMT). So, the connection TI-CSCO
has nothing to do with being a spurned suitor
of Wi-LAN, it is just that TI has a lot of valuable
chip expertise to bring to the table.

The BRCM angle comes from the fact that BRCM is
by far the leader in QAM chip technology (QAM is the
modulation used for each subcarrier of OFDM)>

Best regards,

Bernard Levy