Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Energy Conversion Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Fabeyes who wrote (4174)	11/5/1999 3:40:00 PM
From: WALT REISCH	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8393

Fabeyes, glad to see you touching base again. Yes, Ovonyx is its own company and we (ECD) have a JV with them - or at least that is my understanding of the agreement. I'm waiting to see who the "others" are and where "elsewhere" is. From Tyler's comments, I get the impression that "elsewhere" means both here and abroad. Are you still at the same location/desk? Walt

To: Fabeyes who wrote (4174)	11/5/1999 3:46:00 PM
From: fred whitridge	Respond to of 8393

Fabeyes-- You seem to be knowledgeable on Micron, OUM, and Tyler. So tell us your take on Lockheed as a partner? Word is that this is not even a sub micron fab and thus that we are 16-20x larger than the state of the art .18 micron fabs. I suppose that some fab is better than no fab, eh Fabeyes? or have we shot ourselves in the foot by going with LM which will discourage (prohibit?) other fabs interested in the military/space arena from jumping aboard?

To: Fabeyes who wrote (4174)	11/10/1999 10:12:00 PM
From: Retiarius	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8393

pertinent ovonyx question without revealing the [planned] memory test cell area, thus tipping off a bit about process tech (to eternally pesky shareholders, as opposed to "competitors" who already know)... can it be stated in relatively technology-independent terms, such as ratio of cell size to line width (feature size)? for example, DRAM cells are currently 8(F squared), trending toward 6 F*2, as IBM freely publicizes at: techweb.com for their gigabit chips. also, e.e. times discusses now-routine 256Mbit FLASH tech at eetimes.com where multilevel (2-bit/4-state) FLASH now comes in at 64M cells per 40 sq. mm. 4-bit-per-cell flash exists in the labs.