SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Global Crossing - GX (formerly GBLX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dennis O'Bell who wrote (3119)11/6/1999 3:52:00 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio  Respond to of 15615
 
Hi Dennis, studying the mishaps of early submarine cable placements can be interesting, and some of the earlier findings can run counter to today's prevailing wisdom. Take for example, the findings off the coast of Australia during the turn of the century. They found that telegraph cables were especially vulnerable to electrical charges and electrolytic phenomenon, especially when the cables were placed directly onto the sea bed.

They had to go to great strides to perfect insulation materials and placement techniques in order to mitigate grounding effects.

Odd, wouldn't you say? ..how some things come back in an unsynchronized manner to reinforce the wrong arguments, at the most opportune times. -g-

Regards, Frank Coluccio



To: Dennis O'Bell who wrote (3119)11/7/1999 9:38:00 AM
From: JDN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15615
 
Dear Dennis: I'm a little less scared about possible disaster scenarios
around these cables knowing how long their history is.

What is the alternative? Satellites in space?? Seems to me a fiberoptic cable under the oceans surface is far less susceptible to disaster scenarios then satellites, Then, the cable can always be repaired, not likely in a satellite. JDN