Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert Rose who wrote (83320)	11/6/1999 5:00:00 PM
From: KeepItSimple	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

>b2b could very well prove to be another pyramid scheme. Another? What was the previous one? Are you finally admitting something here?

To: Robert Rose who wrote (83320)	11/6/1999 7:40:00 PM
From: H James Morris	Respond to of 164684

<<The Forrester estimates really do seem too good to be true. >> Robert, as you know I think I might be the only Forrester stock holder here. But wouldn't it be funny if all these researchers were wrong. <<I don't have a lot of respect for the guy myself. >> The guys a pimp. <<Or perhaps not. >> I don't care as long as the mania runs. << Sounds like we're in for a bulls/bears discussion on this thread again? >> Other than Bezos you'll find me the #1 cheerleader of B2B, until the next momo. <<b2b could very well prove to be another pyramid scheme. >> The father of it all. <<Charles Ponzi Ponzi's scheme started out legit: He discovered that it was possible to buy certain financial instruments overseas, then redeem them in the U.S. for more than he'd paid. He interested some investors, and together they made a tidy profit. More investors signed on, and after a while, Ponzi simply stopped buying the instruments and paid off older investors with newer investors' money. Not surprisingly, things ended poorly>>