Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (32394)	11/6/1999 7:04:00 PM
From: John F. Dowd	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

-art: You seem to forget that this guy has been overturned twice before with a lot more specific "evidence". In this decision it is all about MSFT inter-office memos and disregarding even the government witness Mr. Fisher who said that MSFT hadn't harmed the consumer but might in the future. The stuff you are positing is pure FUD. This isn't going to be settled here and everyone gauging Mr. Jackson's demeanor could have told you that it was going to be decided in the Appeals Court. I guess you are looking for a lower entry point then when you got in. As a truly large individual shareholder I bought a little insurance Jan 80 puts as soon as I saw how long it took to craft the "finding of facts" hah! - which meant he had to find the right words to make an arbitrary decision appear as one reached after long deliberation. I think MSFT might get this one dismissed just on the prejudicial behavior of the judge himself. JFD