SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ed who wrote (32499)11/7/1999 4:21:00 AM
From: nihil  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Gaining a Monopoly -- outlawed under Sec 2 of the Sherman Act -- implies the power to set (or strongly influence) prices. There is no formal market definition -- both sides have to quarrel about market definition (good news for economic experts!). A market can be national, regional, or geographically smaller. In a famous case, Alcoa, the decision said "90 percent would surely be a monopoly" while 60 percent might not be. Any accused form that shows competitors can gain market share or are highly profitable, can probably win. Monopoly is not illegal. Unfair aquisition or abuse of a monopoly is illegal. As long as a firm can show that it gained a monopoly through efficiency, innovation, or low (above cost) prices and had not attempted to destroy specific competitors, it will probably win through in the end.
Microsoft should continue on its way, corrected specific practices, appeal, reappeal en banc, petition for certiorari --- move its headquarters to England -- reincorporate in the Channel Isles or
Tonga. Gates should Beos and RHAT in trust for his children. Have a little fun out of this stuff.



To: ed who wrote (32499)11/7/1999 8:34:00 PM
From: Duane L. Olson  Respond to of 74651
 
Ed..Here are the findings. They are VERY specific. So you won't need my "vague statements". Let me know which words you don't understand, and we'll work on it..
Good luck investing!
tso



To: ed who wrote (32499)11/7/1999 8:36:00 PM
From: Duane L. Olson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Ed.. Here are the findings. They are VERY specific. So you won't have to rely on any of my vague statements to clarify the issues. Let me know which words you don't understand, and we'll go from there.
Good luck investing!
biz.yahoo.com
tso