Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ldo79 who wrote (54166)	11/7/1999 11:33:00 AM
From: BigBull	Respond to of 95453

So the White House knows that gas prices will go up and the Justice Dept. sues every Coal fired ute the can get their hands on. Hmmmm - Maybe Hillary's dancing Sheik to cheek. JUST SPECULATING, OF COURSE.

To: ldo79 who wrote (54166)	11/7/1999 3:10:00 PM
From: James Oyer	Respond to of 95453

NG: Another interesting article on NG. May be of interest to the thread. motherearthnews.com Regards joyer

To: ldo79 who wrote (54166)	11/8/1999 3:56:00 PM
From: Merlin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 95453

Since there have been a number of posts directed to the long term outlook for natural gas, I hope this post is not out of line. Is anybody here familiar with Thomas Gold and his writings on the abiogenic orgins of natural gas and petroleum? I first encountered a reference to him in the Wall Street Journal early this year and subsequently read a review of his book "The Deep Hot Biosphere" in Physics Today. Between Gold and the USGS there seems to be a reasonable case for a new perspective on reserves and origins. The fact that Freeman Dyson considers Gold credible also made me take a closer look. Although I am not quite ready to embrace this view, I find it difficult to reject. If anybody has a perspective on this I would like to hear it. << people.cornell.edu >> << greenwood.cr.usgs.gov >>