Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bux who wrote (2652)	11/7/1999 4:06:00 PM
From: tcd	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34857

I find your responses wholly fatiguing. While it's okay to discuss QCOM in comparison to Nokia, QCOM is a tiny company compared to Nokia which sells cellular networks, which sells monitors, which sells applications, and which it has formed many alliances to ensure future prospects. I think Tero's tact has been to show the total global awareness of the company's products. QCOM, on the other hand, while possessing lucrative licenses, has only shown the only facet of its business. That facet is only one of many in Nokia country. I have owned Nokia since Oct 95. An investment of 100 shares then has produced well over 50000 to date. Given the fact that Nokia broad band strategy does not lie with one cellular product, my bets are with Nokia. I would appreciate it if you would PM Tero in the future about your disagreements with Nokia since this is the Nokia board. Lastly, Nokia investors, I think are a more informed lot than the QCOM posters who come to this board to settle their differences. Have you seen any Nokia posters on QCOM's board of late - in the past two years?? tcd