Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dale Baker who wrote (4726)	11/7/1999 12:07:00 PM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10293

The other funny thing about Mr. Blinker's post is that he suggests that Bill "pumping" MSFT on this thread would somehow affect its price. While that might work with TokyoMex and penny stocks, I doubt whether Wexler's "touts" of MSFT will a cause much of a spike :-)

To: Dale Baker who wrote (4726)	11/7/1999 12:23:00 PM
From: Eddy Blinker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

member Baker of the Wexler court...... <<GUMM over MSFT...that's the funniest post I have read all day>>> Dear judge Baker, No doubt ridicule and scorn covering up wickedness and maliciousness of a habitual short sellers agenda works with some unwary investors. You know darn well that I did not, in the remotest sense- even imply GUMM over MSFT- the way your reply intends to corrupt readers mind. Why don't we utilize a different approach then. Shall we? You purchase a 100 shares in MSFT on Monday at 15.45pm sharp. I buy an additional 100 shares in GUMM at the same time. We both close our positions on the last day of trading before Christmas 99. Whoever has the greater return in relation to the invested amount in %%, wins a LUFTHANSA airline return ticket "business class" across the Atlantic, coming summer time. How about it Judge Baker?