SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (41283)11/7/1999 1:54:00 PM
From: Ilaine  Respond to of 71178
 
Accountability BEFORE a disaster strikes is a difficult thing to instill into the members of a bureaucracy, it seems. I recently read speculation as to whether the Challenger disaster would have occurred if the doubts of the engineers about the O-ring had been listened to. As it was, NASA was unwilling to accept responsibility even after the fact. Reagan commissioned a fact-finding panel to inquire into the causes, and the finding about the O-ring was strenuously resisted by NASA, and was only allowed into the report as a sort of foot-note. Of course, it is now widely accepted that it was the failure of the O-ring that caused the disaster.



To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (41283)11/7/1999 2:01:00 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71178
 
Just got back from a Google search double-checking my recollection that it was Richard Feynman who first proposed that it was the o-ring that failed ~ it was.