Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : T.ITE: iTech Capital (TSE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bargainman who wrote (1579)	11/7/1999 11:39:00 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5053

Your comments went further than you are now willing to admit. From - "sleezo Canadian" - Message 11834113 To - "scumbag Canadian" - Message 11839014 ... you do seem to have lost that fine focus on investment allocation decisions for which we all come here. What i don't know is why you lost it. On the absurdity of securities law being provincial in this country, and on the state of inefficacy in which that leaves them - nolo contendere. I agree completely. The US has a far better system, though i am sure you will agree with me that it too has a long freakin way to go to be perfect, or even to considerably reduce the fraud and sleaze so prevalent in its system. But being federal, it has a better structure, a superior base on which to improve - on that we likely agree. It is another thing entirely to make a habit of linking the adjectives 'sleezo' and 'scumbag' with the adjective 'Canadian'. I have known sleezo Americans, and scumbag Americans, and worse, and lots of them sir, but i do not go around pairing those adjectives in general use. Please try to understand this concept. Oh, and one funny thing - guess what nationality jdx's prez enjoys? -g- Now let us examine the relative heinousness of John's sin of making a post on cmgi, in the light of 'acceptable community standards', shall we? ... who shall we pick for a shining example .... um, let's see ... oh, here's a poster who posts on the thread of one stock supporting another - Message 11758820 Now let us examine the effects - techstocks.com ... um, not much effect there, was there? I conclude that the sin is not a mortal one. Watch this space, M'sieu - techstocks.com .. and bonne chance ... salut