Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (62554)	11/8/1999 4:24:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Bradley seems to change tactics to reflect his requirements: Nine years ago, he aimed to "amass money for the sake of amassing money to prevent somebody else from getting in the race," Bradley said in a recent interview. "In this case, you're clearly the underdog and clearly running for a purpose . . . you need to tell people what you believe. This is needing money to get across the things you stand for." washingtonpost.com Bush list: georgewbush.com

To: Bill who wrote (62554)	11/8/1999 4:39:00 PM
From: jbe	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 108807

Bill, I am not the loyalist. You are. All I did was suggest that Bush is weak in the area of foreign affairs, and that Bradley is better prepared in that area than most other candidates. McCain is fairly well prepared, too, and he is a Republican. But I feel as if I had fallen into a hencoop by accident. All of you Bushites are running around, clucking your heads off, poofing up your feathers, and even -- heavens! -- pecking at me! <g>