Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hank who wrote (1536)	11/8/1999 6:41:00 PM
From: Iceberg	Respond to of 5582

I don't know the facts. Period. I never pretended to know the facts. I would very much like to know the facts, but I don't. I'm totally ignorant about the facts. IGNORANT. Get it? My guess is that you are too...or worse...you come on as if you DO know the facts. And that is dangerous. Ice

To: Hank who wrote (1536)	11/8/1999 6:46:00 PM
From: pz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5582

Hank, Here is what TIME magazine thinks is why the article was rejected. Just four days after Gel Tech announced that its study of Zicam had been accepted for publication by the American Journal of Infection Control, the journal editor asked the company to withdraw it. Like an overeager novelist, Gel Tech had given away too much of the ending before the story appeared in print. pathfinder.com

To: Hank who wrote (1536)	11/8/1999 7:18:00 PM
From: Eddy Blinker	Respond to of 5582

<<<surrounding the rejection of the AJIC article>>>> Hank you are twisting the facts and throw fog bombs. The AJIC article was designed to appear in springtime 2000 by the grace of the publisher. When everyone had cured his or her cold and would be looking forward to go to the beach. Wicked and ill designed.That idea was. Then AJIC withdrew the manuscript after it's contents "leaked" and were published by the national press. To get a copyright action going. More money for them as writing about colds, they may have assumed. The whole mess stinks of double cross if you ask me.Again the management of GUMM must be congratulated for their astuteness in detecting shady commercial affairs.They did smell their opponents body odor this time and I pray they remain vigilant during the next few weeks. Bravo and a round of applause for GUMM that they did not fall for this wickedly designed trappery. Eddy Blinker All my humble opinion of course.