Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Cryogenic Solutions Inc. (CYGS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Adrian du Plessis who wrote (3810)	11/8/1999 11:57:00 PM
From: Graystone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4028

Thank you or I hope the readers of this thread thank you. This type of preying on investors is more like fishing than the shrimp farmers would care to admit. I have on occasion used images from stories of the sea, to make my point. We are like little fish in large shoals, trapped by greater forces. The natural and unpredictable swings of the market are a normal investing force. Unscrupulous people who make money through scamming investors never intend to offer a viable product, they are simply fishing for money. The early years of the Internet have provided a perfect climate for people who think scamming investors is just another business. Trust and all it implies are very serious issues here in cyberspace, and those who deserve to be trusted, have earned that trust through a history of credibility. Thank you very much sir, the readers who might have had a single question, have certainly been answered. Good Evening

To: Adrian du Plessis who wrote (3810)	11/9/1999 8:43:00 AM
From: peter michaelson	Respond to of 4028

Adrian: You seem to be having difficulty breaking away. Perhaps in your heart you'd like to stay around. I hope so. We need you. peter

To: Adrian du Plessis who wrote (3810)	11/9/1999 1:50:00 PM
From: Hogger	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4028

Adrian, As you know, there's not a single mis-step in the analyses and summary of Jonathan Curshen and the CYGS touting to be found on the web-site @ imagenisp.com (maintained during those years I was a white collar investigator). Are you saying that your article on cygs was without glaring errors? Are you claiming that you did indeed perform all the normal prudent steps of investigation and did not rely to a great deal upon people who might have harbored some manner of grudge against cygs and persons associated with the company? Do you affirm that all of the content is correct ... or to be very liberal, that the content is sufficiently correct to a degree that it can be reasonably warranted? You state that you were a 'white collar' investigator. Is there any reason that more credulence should be afford your status than should be afforded any other person who investigates for him/herself? I suppose that the question is simply, "Insofar as CYGS and personnel directly involved with that company, is your article sufficiently free of MAJOR errors to stake your reputation on it?" If so, then I will stand admonished. I have had to make a few apologies lately, and if you are due such, I will apologize. Awaiting your reply and warranty, I remain Hogger - Adm(Hon)