To: Jim Bishop who wrote (13654 ) 11/9/1999 3:16:00 PM From: jmhollen Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 150070
Hi Jim, [re: AQCI] This firm uses KPMG for it's accounting/audits, and they are actively amending/filing the required paperwork to get AQCI back into the "..world of the living..". To the very best of my understanding, it was simply administrative overload that let the situation fall behind. Better to have the Boss ram-rodding the damn project than shuffling papers in some cases (..this one in particular..). Working in the boonies in South America ain't no picnic, and customs gave them delays/fits (..typical if you aren't in the "in crowd", or hip to the "perdido" ..) getting the harvesting machine into the country. Then there was the small matter of schlepping the sucker up the roads and rivers, and lifting it into the lake. By the way, I have worked in concert with some of the folks at KPMG while at GE in VA. They are a first class crew, and aren't going to play any games with numbers for anybody's benefit; straight shooters [Arthur Anderson look-a-likes]..!! [..If that crap-tush outfit MVEE used KPMG instead of ACME-of-Studio City, even it might come across as believable..] I have to agree with you that PINK only looks good on my daughters, my grandgirlie, and Mary Kaye bonus cars. But, this is one of those instances where the transition back onto the BB may bring a **** of a run with sustained prices. Keep it on your radar, and a few shares at today's prices may well be woth the risk. If you I.D. some of the longtime posters (..and ignore the twits..) on the SI & RB AQCI threads you will find some pretty reasonable folks. I have a small collection, and may add more soon - so this will be my last "..hype.." (yuk yuk yuk) on the subject. John :-) ps: if this is a duplicate post - it's because of SI's "..hoser.." this morning.