Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Solucorp Industries (SLUP - OTCBB) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: junglejims who wrote (3065)	11/9/1999 1:03:00 PM
From: hawkeye	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3679

Did letter say ANYTHING at all??? Or was it like: Dear Mr. Moore, Thank you for your letter of October xx, 1999, in which you have expressed your interest in the SLUP case, etc.,etc. What investigation?? Can not talk about it. If I can be of further assistance in this (if in fact there is such a matter as the SLUP investigation) or in any other matter please let me know. Sincerely Paul R. Berger Assistant Director SEC - WHERE WE MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO PROTECT THE INNOCENT REPUTATIONS OF THOSE WE PRESUME ARE GUILTY AS CHARGED -

To: junglejims who wrote (3065)	11/9/1999 4:09:00 PM
From: hawkeye	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3679

DEAR MR. BERGER, HOW IS IT HUMANLY POSSIBLE TO TAKE 19 MONTHS TO INVESTIGATE A COMPANY THE SIZE OF SOLUCORP ?????????????????? WHEN WILL THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION CONSIDER THE STAFF'S CASE AGAINST SOLUCORP ?????????????? WHEN WILL THE SEC MAKE A PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF THE EVIDENCE IT HAS AMASSED AGAINST SOLUCORP THAT PROVES THAT IT HAS COMMITTED AN EREGIOUS FRAUD ON THE INVESTING PUBLIC???? WHEN WILL THE SEC PUT ITSELF IN THE SHOES OF A SOLUCORP SHAREHOLDER TO SEE HOW THE COMMISSION"S HANDLING OF THE SLUP CASE LOOKS FROM THE OUTSIDE LOOKING IN ??????? WHAT, IF ANYTHING, PREVENTS THE SEC FROM TAKING FORMAL ACTION TO PROTECT THE INVESTING PUBLIC AT THE END OF THE TEN-DAY "TEMPORARY' SUSPENSION PERIOD? WHAT ARE THE POLICY REASONS THAT JUSTIFY NOT DISCLOSING ANY EVIDENCE OR FINDINGS OR OTHERWISE TAKING A JUDICIALLY REVIEWABLE ACTION AGAINST A COMPANY AT THE END OF THE TEN-DAY PERIOD? WHAT IS THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE 10 OTHER COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK WAS SUBJECT TO SEC IMPOSED TRADING HALTS IN 1998??? DO ANY OF THOSE COMPANIES HAVE REAL BUSINESSES AND PRODUCTS OTHER THAN EMPTY MINESHAFTS AND PRODUCTS THAT EXIST ONLY ON PAPER AND IN THE IMAGINATIONS OF INVESTORS??? HOW MANY OF THOSE TEN OTHER COMPANIES HOLD PATENTS ON A BENEFICIAL TECHNOLOGY THAT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY AN EXECUTIVE-LEVEL US GOVERNMENT AGENCY AND WHICH IS BEING FURTHER PROVED EVERYDAY IN THE REAL WORLD????? DO THE SEC'S POLICIES RESPECTING ENFORCEMNT INVESTIGATIONS AND ACTIONS IN ANY WAY TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE INTERESTS OF A COMPANY'S EXISTING SHAREHOLDERS????? IF NOT, WHY NOT???? DOES THE COMMISSION EVER DISCLOSE TO THE PUBLIC THE RECORD EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE COMMISSION DECIDED THAT IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, THE POTENTIALY DEVASTATING REMEDY OF A TRADING SUSPENSION IS REQUIRED???????? hAWKEYE (not HAWKEYE, CITIZEN, USA)

To: junglejims who wrote (3065)	11/9/1999 11:09:00 PM
From: hawkeye	Respond to of 3679

Maybe they want to know about the industry that is most threatened by SLUP!!!!! Message 11767429