Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Duke of URL© who wrote (33422)	11/9/1999 2:47:00 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

"They lost in the market place against a competitor that in no way was at that time even remotely a monopoly." Duke, the first part of Judge Jackson's fact finding document establishes that Microsoft had more than the critical 70 percent of the market - the point which defines what a monopoly is in the eyes of the law. In fact, Jackson goes farther and shows that MSFT had at least 80 percent of the market. I had an opportunity to use OS-2 and found that it was robust, rarely crashed, but also lacked software applications, which is what killed it. MSFT didn't help. Worse, MSFT, in deciding IBM was a competitor, delayed in granting a license to IBM, forcing IBM to miss the back to college season. Even if the present case goes no farther than it has, the court, through its examination of documents supplied mostly from Microsoft itself, has established a strong basis for IBM to sue for tortious interference with its business. When people say that MSFT did nothing wrong or nothing that other companies wouldn't do or actually do, the difference between other companies and MSFT is that the evidence supports a finding that MSFT is a monopoly. Monopolies are treated differently from smaller companies. That's what the Sherman Antitrust Law is about. And that's why Judge Bork, perhaps the most conservative judge this country has seen in the last 20 years, believes that MSFT violated the antitrust law.