From Morgan Stanley, more possible E-commerce stuff!
I believe the technology-driven capital spending boom has finally ended the "productivity paradox." Courtesy of the breakthrough "shared infrastructure" of the Internet, the technology boom has begun to raise the economy's speed limit to 3%. However, this new limit isn't guaranteed-I believe tht it hinges on a continued, intense technology boom.
The good news: The boom is gathering strength. In my view, IT's two defining characteristics-continuously falling prices and the continuously growing value of the Internet's shared infrastructure-assure that technology demand will continue to outpace significantly the rest of the economy at least for the next few years. Indeed, Morgan Stanley Dean Witter technology analysts believe that e- commerce imperatives will likely sustain strong hardware, software and telecommunications equipment demand for the foreseeable future, overwhelming any temporary, Y2K-related slowing.
Technology's global spread is a secular development, and it hasn't exterminated cyclical forces than can push up inflation or create economic imbalances. But its spreading use has helped dampen cyclical fluctuations and has made the economy more sensitive to price signals.
DETAILS:
America's infatuation with Information Technology has never been at such a fever pitch. Outlays for IT equipment, software and IT services are running at a $500 billion annual clip, or 5.7% of nominal GDP, and that figure doesn't include compensation for the army of IT support workers, much less the $1.5 trillion in wealth created by the rise in technology stock prices over the past year. Yet the debate over the economic payoff from this technology boom has never been more intense. While it is important to recognize that true shifts in economic trends are slow to emerge, we believe that the jury has now come in to render a verdict: The "productivity paradox"-sluggish productivity growth in the face of rapid advances in and rapidly growing use of information technology-is ending.
Yes, the boom in information technology has finally begun to pay off, boosting productivity growth to about 2%, and thus the economy's noninflationary speed limit to roughly 3%. This improvement represents more than the typical cyclical pickup in productivity growth that accompanies an acceleration in the economy. And it represents more than just the explosion in productivity in the industries that make this high-tech gear.
Two factors explain why the shift is at last now occurring: First, I believe company strategies that use information technology to cut costs, such as "just-in time" inventory management techniques, are paying off in a significant way. Second, and more important, using computers for many business functions didn't really pay off until they could exchange information easily using the Internet's "shared infrastructure"-sharing costs among all users avoids both the costs and the risks of investing in the quickly-obsolete proprietary systems of the 1980s and early 1990s. The Internet made possible the explosion in business-to-business (B2B) commerce, which is just gathering steam. And the upsurge in telecommunications capacity should accelerate the process by making it cheaper. While we don't capture the direct revenue or market impact of such strategies in this analysis, I believe that the imperatives of e-commerce are driving the booming demand for and economic impact of IT hardware.
These aren't just one-off improvements, because technology is reshaping business strategies. Just as important, however, these developments carry with them three critical caveats. First, the resulting higher economic speed limit is not an eternal economic constant. The high-productivity economy is a hungry machine, and will have to be fed with continued rapid increases in high-tech investment to sustain the higher rates of productivity growth. In that sense, a self-sustaining, faster rate of improvement in our living standards is far from a foregone conclusion. Fortunately, technology spending growth seems likely to remain strong, as long as the promise of further improvements and the lure of cheaper gear continue.
The second caveat is even more fundamental. A higher speed limit does not mean that there are no speed limits. Far from it. Any disinflationary dividend from the boost to productivity is a secular development, recently amplified by the cyclical disinflationary effects of the global financial crisis. The two swamped potential inflation pressures resulting from three years of growth above the economy's now-higher, sustainable pace. But our global healing story is all about cyclical improvement in the global economy. As it recalibrates inflation expectations to precrisis levels, those dormant inflation pressures likely will slowly resurface.
A final word of caution: Recently, productivity has accelerated to a rate that tempts an even more favorable conclusion about the economy's speed limit. New estimates of GDP imply that nonfarm business productivity rose by an average 2 1/4% per year over the past five years (vs. 1.7% previously) and nearly 2 3/4% in the past two years. Moreover, estimated as gross domestic income per hour rather than real gross product per hour, productivity over the past two years rose by 3 3/4% percent at an annual rate. Is the speed limit thus as much as 3 1/2% or even higher? We doubt it. The evidence we consider in the latest Inside the U.S. Economy seems broadly consistent with 3%.
This nuanced view hardly resolves the technology-cum-productivity conundrum, but I had no expectation of finding the grail when I set out on the journey. Our position is cautious compared with the sweeping optimism of the "new paradigm" analysts who believe that the digital revolution has ushered in an era of inflation-free growth. On the other hand, our view seems to stand in contrast with Steve Roach's belief that the productivity paradox is alive and well in the U.S. economy. Yet Steve and I strongly agree about two things. First, the accelerating pace of technological innovation will reshape the U.S. and global economies, and both Europe and Japan seem poised on the cusp of a technology spending spree that will rival our own. And second, U.S. companies are perfectly positioned to benefit from this global boom as it unfolds.
Note: This is an excerpt from "The Technology Boom and the U.S. Economy: Paradigm Found or Paradox Revisited" in Inside the U.S. Economy, November 8, 1999. Please contact your Morgan Stanley Dean Witter representative for a copy or locate one on Client Link at www.ms.com.
The information and opinions in this report were prepared by Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated ("Morgan Stanley Dean Witter"). Morgan Stanley Dean Witter does not undertake to advise you of changes in its opinion or information. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter and others associated with it may make markets or specialize in, have positions in and effect transactions in securities of companies mentioned and may also perform or seek to perform investment banking services for those companies. Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. and/or their affiliates or their employees have or may have a long or short position or holding in the securities, options on securities, or other related investments of issuers mentioned herein. The investments discussed or recommended in this report may not be suitable for all investors. Investors must make their own investment decisions based on their specific investment objectives and financial position and using such independent advisors as they believe necessary. Where an investment is denominated in a currency other than the investor's currency, changes in rates of exchange may have an adverse effect on the value, price of, or income derived from the investment. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. Income from investments may fluctuate. The price or value of the investments to which this report relates, either directly or indirectly, may fall or rise against the interest of investors. To our readers in the United Kingdom: Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, regulated by the Securities and Futures Authority Limited, and/or its affiliates may be providing or may have provided significant advice or investment services, including investment banking services, for any company mentioned in this report. Private investors should obtain the advice of their Morgan Stanley Dean Witter representative about the investments concerned. This publication is disseminated in Japan by Morgan Stanley Japan Limited and in Singapore by Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Asia (Singapore) Pte. To our readers in the United States: While Morgan Stanley Dean Witter has prepared this report, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. are distributing the report in the US and accept responsibility for it contents. Any person receiving this report and wishing to effect transactions in any security discussed herein should do so only with a representative of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated or Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. To our readers in Spain: AB Asesores Bursatiles Bolsa SVB, S.A., a Morgan Stanley Dean Witter group company, supervised by the Spanish Securities Markets Commission (CNMV), hereby states that this document has been written and distributed in accordance with the rules of conduct applicable to financial research as established under Spanish regulations. To our readers in Australia: This publication has been issued by Morgan Stanley Dean Witter but is being distributed in Australia by Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Australia Limited A.C.N. 003 734 576, a licensed dealer, which accepts responsibility for its contents. Any person receiving this report and wishing to effect transactions in any security discussed in it may wish to do so with an authorized representative of Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Australia Limited. To our readers in Canada: This publication has been prepared by Morgan Stanley Dean Witter and is being made available in certain provinces of Canada by Morgan Stanley Canada Limited. Morgan Stanley Canada Limited has approved of, and has agreed to take responsibility for, the contents of this information in Canada. Additional information on recommended securities is available on request.
Copyright 1999 Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. |