Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: art slott who wrote (33465)	11/9/1999 3:15:00 PM
From: Brian Malloy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

We all matter art. How can you be so cold and callous? You two arts are an interesting duo.

To: art slott who wrote (33465)	11/9/1999 4:28:00 PM
From: John F. Dowd	Respond to of 74651

-art: I don't know whether you have the attention span to stay with this article but it pretty well dismantles the judges point that MSFT abused IBM and caused the demise of O/S 2. In a clearly outlined presentation the author goes through the judge's "finding" citing the pertinent paragraphs therein and shows how it was IBM's poor decision making that caused O/S2 to flounder and ultimately fail. byte.com

To: art slott who wrote (33465)	11/9/1999 5:42:00 PM
From: Duane L. Olson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74651

Amen: Taxman posed a good review of both sides of the issue in a link: pbs.org The "Newshour" segment, with two legal experts was an excellent capsule summary of the report and an allusion to the course of the case from here: pbs.org BTW, I noticed the other day that several of the MSFT holders said they were going to move their focus to QCOM. QCOM held it's own today, so they must be having some effect. The speculators, however, must have gone to BEOS -- sorry I missed THAT one!!