Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dooker who wrote (48702)	11/9/1999 8:51:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

cs, some good points. levis got rich during the gold rush, not your average gold seeker. qcom may meet expectations of 250% growth this year and 30% growth every year for the next 10 years inspite of only growing revs only 18% this year. i'd just assign a probability to it of about 1-3% while the market assigns a probability of 110%. minor disagreement ;-) i will say that the builders of the net ultimately rely on the end users. i say ultimately b/c it may be awhile before folks figure out end users (retail) won't make any money on the net, on average. >> And the winners with their shareholders will be rich. SO THERE!<< no, they ARE rich. just like the avg japanese person in 1989. the hyper growth of the net is behind us. the greedy will be worse financially worse off than if the net never existed. oh, and then we get to the possibility of a recession over the next 10 years. i'd assign a high probability of a recession and the market assigns a -10% probability. if a recession hits, all bets are off.