SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : A CENTURY OF LIONS/THE 20TH CENTURY TOP 100 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (1304)11/9/1999 6:40:00 PM
From: jbe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3246
 
Neocon, it is precisely BECAUSE I am not a Hemingway fan, that I insist on recognizing his influence, as an objective fact.

Fair is fair, after all. Just because I do not particularly like someone is no reason to deny that he was influential -- or even that the influence, on the whole, was to the good.

I accept your determination to exclude all the obvious "meanies" from your list -- the Hitlers, Stalins, et al. But folks like Keynes and Hemingway do not fall into the "meanies" category. To say that you are excluding them because, in your opinion, they did not exert a "positive" influence over-all indicates, to me, that you are allowing a strong ideological bias to interfere with your objectivity.

Joan



To: Neocon who wrote (1304)11/9/1999 6:40:00 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3246
 
You're really shortchanging Hemingway. Joan is right about his influence, especially relative to others you list.