SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don Troppmann who wrote (26952)11/10/1999 2:04:00 PM
From: capitalistbeatnik  Respond to of 213182
 
Hey I have no problem with it. I've always wanted to invest in the next big smut market. Digital porno everywhere all running on Quicktime. Cha Ching.



To: Don Troppmann who wrote (26952)11/10/1999 2:06:00 PM
From: MeDroogies  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 213182
 
Virtually every major advance in technology has been pushed forward faster due to the "unseemly" use of that technology for pornography.
I don't see how that has a good/bad component to it. If early adopters choose to utilize a product for carnal pleasures...more power to them. The likelihood is they will make alot of money early, and many of them will use that cash to move into the next, more commercial, phase.
AAPL, for better or worse, has provided infrastructure that propels this forward. It isn't a bad thing. I consider it a good thing. And he isn't wrong, either. The likelihood is that porno is going to get even bigger.
What you'd miss at this point, if you're not paying attention, is how the other uses of the product will make even more money. Porno on the 'net isn't the overwhelming product it once was. It used to be 80% of all revenues and advertising. The last I saw, it's less than 15%. Shows how commercial uses push this stuff to the side. Still, at 15%, it is still a large money winner and is making more money than ever before.

So, his point is well taken......just short sighted, IMHO.



To: Don Troppmann who wrote (26952)11/10/1999 3:30:00 PM
From: BillHoo  Respond to of 213182
 
Yes, and television was supposed to herald a new era of science and technology to educate the masses.

Art and information was to be shared in a global network of televideo stations.

Hmmm.

But you seem to argue that porno is negative?

If quicktime will bring smiles and hours of entertainment content to the masses, how can that be bad? And if it brings $$ to AAPL, even better!

-Bill_H