SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Prognosticator who wrote (22722)11/10/1999 5:01:00 PM
From: Thomas Mercer-Hursh  Respond to of 64865
 
It would be a lot more amazing in reverse. Even back in the late 80s with much more primitive emulator technology and running X across a network, one could get pretty credible performance. This depended to some degree on the application, of course -- graphics intensive ones obviously doing less well, but the biggest problem back then wasn't performance, but rather whether it would run at all.

To make the comparison more meaningful, one would obviously like to start by having some numbers instead of just anecdotal evidence, but even then one would like to compare like to like. I.e., what applications are we talking about and what is the relationship to the same application or an equivalent running natively.



To: Prognosticator who wrote (22722)11/10/1999 5:01:00 PM
From: QwikSand  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
The PowerPC is and always has been a damn good architecture. Its early schedule delays combined with the usual Outer Limits-style IBM internal politics killed it off as a general purpose server device. However, the coming revisions of the 64-bit PowerPC are supposed to be pretty hot. They may put Apple in a surprising position in the next couple of years, especially if IA-64 doesn't live up to its hype.

--QS