To: crudestope who wrote (4942 ) 11/11/1999 1:24:00 AM From: russet Respond to of 7235
Hi crudestope, I suppose if I hadn't stumbled on this company (URL below), I may agree with you about companies not issuing weekly reports, or answering shareholder questions posed on the internet in a public forum. I afraid I disagree that most companies keep their shareholders fully informed. I do see more information coming out when a company faces a hostile takeover.http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=11776902 Look for other posts by Jesse for more comments by the companies president Rick Boulay. Rick regularly scans the posts on SI to look for questions he can answer, or just to comment on posts that catch his eye. Seems to me to be the future for honest companies. Companies will ignore this trend at their peril. I predict honest companies that involve themselves with the internet in this way, disseminating their thoughts, dreams and information will gain more loyal shareholders than not. Here's another thread that is so good, the participants should be hired by the company to disseminate information. There are knowledgeable participants relaying information to the rest of us as it happens on the drill site. There are many threads on SI like this. Information is everything. A shareholder that ignores it, isn't much of an investor.http://www.siliconinvestor.com/subject.aspx?subjectid=10357 Language, borders, politics, religion, torture and many other tools have been used to keep the average person ignorant, defenseless and enslaved, unable to move up in socioeconomic status for millennia. It will be difficult for the elite keepers of the knowledge, not to share with the poor ignorant peon shareholders as the internet creeps into the fabric of the world. Debate will occur, and a company will be challenged and their success will be measured by their words. Could work for countries too. It is certainly changing the U.S. quickly in all functions and aspects of normal everyday life (and Canada too). I suspect that is the future for the entire world eventually. Constant worldwide communication and debate should sweep democracy into power throughout the world. Many companies I've invested in here in Canada have offered their shareholders rights offerings to acquire investment dollars. Very junior companies, ones like SUF was a few years ago, don't have a wide enough investor following to allow such an offering to succeed. That is why the brokers are around. They take the risk that they might not be able to sell the issue, and for that they get paid well. I'd want to be too. Many world class mines have been found by Canadian junior exploration companies getting their starts from money coming from our stock markets. These tend to be forgotten once a big company buys them out, but many become big companies too. People tend to dwell on the failures, and ignore the successes. One thing is certain,.....corruption, greed and bullchit know no international boundaries. If other markets embrace junior companies, they will get their share of scams too. Numbers can hide has much as they can show. Back to SUF, The non-recourse funding is for the development of Messina. SUF still has to come up with money (US$10 million) to buy 54% of Messina. I have not heard confirmation that that funding is coming from South African banks. The rumor I've heard is that funding may come from another country. One last thing,...Canadian banks and financial lenders of many stripes have lent money to many Canadian mining companies in the form of a simple loan backed by the assets of the company based on feasibility studies too. Our banks are also flush with cash, but much of it seems to be chasing technology companies of all types. Results from these companies appear to be almost instantaneous. Few mining companies are lucky enough to get results so quickly, hence they are being somewhat ignored in North America. Just a squished hamsters thoughts.