Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Image Entertainment (DISK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Laptev who wrote (366)	11/10/1999 7:36:00 PM
From: MKTBUZZ	Respond to of 379

I'm not happy with the management either. However, one of the best times to buy is when a company operates in a market where the product sells itself, and no matter how bad the company is, if they have a 10% share, that means something. Let's just hope it doesn't mean $3/share. Let's see what happens with DVDPLANET.com IMHO

To: Laptev who wrote (366)	11/12/1999 1:10:00 PM
From: William T. Katz	Respond to of 379

State of DISK (Analysis) Well, now that I've listened to the conf call and had some time to cool down after reading that press release, I'll try to post a more complete analysis of where I think DISK is today. DISK really should be considered four different types of business: (1) independent studio, (2) distributor, (3) fulfillment house, and (4) e-tailer through kencranes.com. If you looked at DISK a year or two ago, there were considerable opportunities in all of these areas. I think at this point in time, we can probably get a more realistic viewpoint of where DISK might be a year from now, given how they have executed their game plan. (1) Independent Studio: Not a big surprise in this area. DVD is taking off as many of us expected, and the studios will not be issuing exclusive licensing for most of their titles. DISK will have to be content with snapping up the rights to a variety of peripheral programming. However, I continue to feel that DISK sales of exclusive programming should rise considerably given that their exclusive titles will probably be the last ones to get bought by new DVD owners. For example, if I'm starting a DVD collection, my first selection probably won't be Kiss but Sling Blade/etc. As the rental places increase their inventory, though, DISK should make inroads. Verdict: Exclusive title growth should parallel or exceed DVD growth and this composes the high margin part of the business. 2) Distributor - The studios are selling direct to all the big e-tailers now that those companies compose a large % of DVD sales. Luckily, studios are slow (for now... don't expect them to stay that way) and DISK is seeing an increase in their catalog business. But this is a cut-throat business and Valley Media (and others) will be very thirsty for business now that the studios are bypassing them for big clients. Verdict: Good for now but expect increased competition for clients. Low margins regardless. 3) Fulfillment house. Somewhat puzzling picture here. Las Vegas still not operating at optimal efficiency despite very long development period. Image still not fulfilling for kencranes. Conf call indicated this was due to having to implement over a dozen EDI maps (?) instead of the usual 5-6 for typical customer. This doesn't make sense to me since Image can just treat kencranes.com as a typical customer for now. And if kencranes.com isn't hooked in, nobody else probably is. So much for my dream of having Image be the back-end fulfillment house for e-tailers. Instead, those e-tailers are establishing their own warehouses, buying from studios direct, and (perhaps) will use Image for other orders if Valley Media and others don't get there first. Verdict: Developmental mishaps hamper this possibility. Wait and see if anything happens here. 4) E-tailer: Marty claims kencranes.com doing great. I think they are dropping the ball. EW article gives kencranes.com an A- compared to Reel.com A+. It's stupid to think Reel.com will just sit on their laurels while DVDPlanet is developed. It's stupid to dismiss DVDExpress. You guys make a comparison: reel.com amazon.com dvd.com kencranes.com How much of kencranes.com revenue was from the RCA deal? I agree that having names of RCA DVD buyers is great, but who knows when DVDPlanet.com is ready? Target is now mid-February.. anyone want to guess end of March? And in that period, I'm sure the other e-tailers will not improve at all <right>. Overall, DISK will grow revenue rapidly as DVD penetrates the video market. Their independent studio business will continue to improve. Unfortunately, they have not inspired any confidence in their retailing and electronic fulfillment aspects. They will have to prove to me that they can execute in those areas since they have repeatedly missed deadlines. Possible downside: Profits in independent studio/DVD distribution side gets eaten by bad game plan on internet e-tailing side. Possible upside: They actually get their infrastructure working and have a competitive DVDPlanet.com. At this point, it's wait and see on the internet side. Given their track record, I'm prone to think they will not be more than a small e-tailing player with DVDPlanet. Lots of big competition that have had better track records. Conclusion: DISK should go up from here based on DVD penetration into households. Most of its value is as an independent DVD studio. While most of the hype centers on the internet retailing aspects, I think it will only matter if IPO can milk money from market. Without IPO, e-tailer will provide additional revenue but not be a big player.

To: Laptev who wrote (366)	11/16/1999 3:41:00 PM
From: William T. Katz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 379

Given DISK's intention of building up DVD Express, it makes sense to look at how other e-tailers are doing in terms of revenue, etc. Take a look at DVD Express. The link below gives some information taken from the withdrawn IPO filing. www2.ipo.com Basically DVD Express shows: 1998 revenue = approx $17 million 1998 income = loss $4.5 million 72 employees These are 1998 revenue figures, so expect this number to be a lot higher for 99. For kencranes.com, we have from the last report: Half-year revenue = $1.6 million Half-year income = loss $1.2 million The above revenue is after taking out inter-company sales. With it, kencranes is at $7.2 million revenue.