Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (15889)	11/10/1999 11:18:00 PM
From: I. N. Vester	Respond to of 27311

Working capital deficit has decreased by $2.5M. It was about $8.5M at the end of the prior quarter. On a personal note Larry, concerning your own successful non-investment in Vlnc: you must not value your time having spent so much on vlnc with nothing gained from it except avoiding any paper loss. I guess your time is worth nothing. One more thing, concerning Carl Berg, your beliefs that he has to answer to your or anyone else 'why didn't he put more $$ into the company instead of getting Castle Creek involved' only shows how full of yourself you are. You're an unemployed nobody criticizing the investments of one of the fortune 400 individuals. Criticizing him for not putting more of his money into a company you don't even own. Your self-importance is rather remarkable. You must really think you're some kind of super investor.

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (15889)	11/11/1999 12:03:00 AM
From: Robert Cohen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Larry, You have made it clear that you have no position in VLNC. Yet you have analyzed every filing and comment regularly regarding VLNC's financial condition, their production capability and day to day fluctuations in the share price. On the other hand you have made it clear that you do have a position in ULBI. Their stock price is at a 52 week low, production capability is far in the future and they are using Cobalt which all agree is less safe than manganese for large format cells. Despite these troubling issues your posts are conspicuously absent from the ULBI threads. Please comment. Robert