Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The New Iomega '2000' Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Naggrachi who wrote (3389)	11/10/1999 10:18:00 PM
From: Gottfried	Respond to of 5023

Zead, tsk tsk. So young and already so cynical.<G> G. [end]

To: Naggrachi who wrote (3389)	11/10/1999 11:25:00 PM
From: Tom Carroll	Respond to of 5023

LS-120 Redux Zead, Sheila, etcetera My take on this is that Compaq, among others, has inherited a huge back inventory of these devices. They have to unload them somehow. This is how they're going to do it. It's not their meat and potatoes. They're not stupid enough to think that they can pit the LS-120 directly against the Zip any longer, that's for sure. For example, they're not using that stupid campaign where they say that the (cache-enhanced) LS-120 beats the (slow as molasses) parallel Zip. Cheers, Tom (still long IOM)