Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JGoren who wrote (48999)	11/10/1999 10:23:00 PM
From: 100cfm	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

can someone please translate what this means for us. thanks. and where the hell did dect come from?

To: JGoren who wrote (48999)	11/10/1999 10:51:00 PM
From: Boplicity	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

JG, re: ITU and 3G, Most of them don't care. I read it, it's still a tower of babble. I was hoping for a single standard at the beginning of the year based on CDMA, it's not going to happen. One thing we can take from the ITU and HDR demos, is that year 2000 is a transition year, were broadband wireless picture will become clearer and a base is laid for the next gen wireless offerings. One has to ask themselves the following question. What will move QCOM higher next year, if we have to wait 12 months or more before these new income generating ideas come to market? The current crop of broad wireless network companies that are providing LMDS are seeing the market develop slowly. What will be different with HDR? xDSL is exploding with 80 millions able use xDSl. Will HDR be too late? Is the current stock price looking at out too far, expecting too much? Also, Wireless knowledge is still screwing around doing demos. Where is the meat? How and when are they going to contribute and generate income from whatever it is they are doing? greg

To: JGoren who wrote (48999)	11/10/1999 11:00:00 PM
From: jhg_in_kc	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

<While you guys are busy congratulating yourselves on our good luck and fortune, important things are happening--the ITU standards have been proposed> Please explain why this is important and is the news good or bad, if you would be so kind. thanskx jhg

To: JGoren who wrote (48999)	11/10/1999 11:01:00 PM
From: DOUG H	Respond to of 152472

nice grub.

To: JGoren who wrote (48999)	11/10/1999 11:19:00 PM
From: SpudFarmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

JGoren: By the time I get clarification on this, you all will probably have it all figured out. I've been busier than a cat in a room full of rockers (Not nervous). I will not speculate until I am sure, so it is now time for me to shut up. Ha, ha. Q rocks, patiently...

To: JGoren who wrote (48999)	11/11/1999 1:36:00 AM
From: jack bittner	Respond to of 152472

<while you guys are ... congratulating yourselves> does that mean you think the ITU standards are bad for Q? year ago, before the ericy settlement, maybe cdma wouldn't've been included, i think. it'll take a little while for europeans to get fed up with inferior technology, because they go more for price than technical efficiency - so they can afford those 4-6 week vacations. but in 5-6 years of seeing cdma next to gsm, they'll get jealous and buy, i think.