Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 100cfm who wrote (49036)	11/10/1999 11:40:00 PM
From: GO*QCOM	Respond to of 152472

The jury at AT&T is hardly out when it comes to preserving there arcaine TDMA.AT&T(the parent company to AT&T wireless) has hired The Strategis Group to study the situation as concerns cost of converting to CDMA 3G or 1XRTT (despite AT&T wireless protest)as they AT&T(parent company)are getting nervous.The situation is dire as they are capacity constrained and EDGE (a network overlay for TDMA) will NOT help them with voice capacity issues as it only dose data.They will have to go with CDMA or risk extinction in a sea of HDR, CDMA ,3G rocket bandwith ,that is beginning to choke off there oxgen.

To: 100cfm who wrote (49036)	11/10/1999 11:44:00 PM
From: Bux	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

was hoping tdma would become extinct. this does not put any pressure on att to switch from tdma. also does this mean gsm is not evolving to wcdma The standards are not designed to pressure operators to upgrade to a more cost effective solution, that is what competition is for. Formerly, CDMA was not allowed on European spectrum in order to compete. If wireless voice and data use continues to grow as it has been, it will become increasingly sensible for European operators to deploy a CDMA solution. The demand for fast data will require an upgrade to some form of 3G. The proposed 3G solutions (including DECT and GPRS) are not compatible with current handsets. It is my belief that when the newer 3G networks (that are not compatible with current subscriber devices) are deployed, they will be CDMA for reasons of total cost, ease of deployment, ease of adding additional capacity, performance of soft-hand-off, resistance to multi-path interference and capacity benefits. Not because the standards bodies mandate it. GSM is well entrenched and I would not hope for a fast and complete change of technology. That would be too disruptive. More likely is a gradual replacement of some frequencies with CDMA or the deployment of CDMA in unused spectrum. The market will drive the choice. While Europe is a big market, I would look towards other markets for near-term CDMA growth. Bux