Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Solucorp Industries (SLUP - OTCBB) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: junglejims who wrote (3190)	11/11/1999 4:24:00 AM
From: hawkeye	Respond to of 3679

Under normal circumstances, the Congressman's office would just forward a constituent's letter to the agency with a cover letter asking for a response with copies to both the Congressman and the constituent. In the everyday case, there is no need to ask whether the agency will respond. It goes without saying. Last thing that an agency wants to do is pizz-off a Congressman. Even a so-called "untouchable" agency like the SEC. But this is a VERY UNUSAL CASE!!!! When a constituent tells a Congressman that his privacy was invaded by armed federal law enforcement officers and a police bomb squad for questionable reasons, the Congressman HAS TO DO SOMETHING ! Let's face it, a search of a citizen's home is A DRASTIC RESPONSE under any circumstance!!!( SEC apparently is well-versed in taking drastic actions). Also, there is the history of the SEC's rubber-stamped Response Form No. xxxx -"Response to Inquiry Regarding Ongoing Investigation". -- So the Congressman's office knew that they had to speak directly with a person at the SEC, perhaps someone that they had dealt with before. Telephone calls from a Congressman ALWAYS get answered promptly!! Whether the agency resisted the idea of writing to aauhaa we can not tell. Credit must be given to aauhaa's Congressman for having extracted from the SEC A PROMISE TO SEND a STATEMENT OF THE AGENCY'S POSITION ON (to be revealed) THIS WEEK!!! Hopefully, the agency will keep that promise and hopefully they will send it through other than the normal snail-mail. (I know one thing for sure. The letter will be sent in an exemplary pristine envelope!!). WE ARE EAGERLY WAITING (SLUPPIES ARE WELL VERSED IN WAITING FOR THE SEC!!!!!!!) TO HEAR WHAT AND HOW MUCH THE SEC HAS TO SAY ABOUT THOSE MATTERS THAT ARE OF CONCERN TO aauhaa, AND TO US ALL. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!THE ENTIRE SI SLUPPIE NATION IS WATCHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

To: junglejims who wrote (3190)	11/11/1999 9:06:00 AM
From: aauhaa	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3679

I know the usual say nothing letter that the SEC deigns to send. I received one from Ms Finston in reply to my initial inquiry. When my Congressman inquired the first time (Aug 27th), he received from SEC a letter with some substance - how SLUP could file for re-listing after 10 days, that they had, but did not answer inquiry from NASD for more information. I advised my Congressman that SEC was misinformed. I understand that the market maker who had filed for re-listing had answered the inquiry; that when they received back the same inquiry in different language, lawyers were sent to NASD to find our what gives. Answer was that NASD would stall and not re-list until SEC inquiry was concluded - again some invisible black hand - probably SEC saying "DONT". We could have and should have been trading on the NASDDQBB a year ago. Conspiracy? The stench of this thing where the SEC is concerned is awful.