Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Amy J who wrote (92134)	11/11/1999 5:19:00 AM
From: The Duke of URL©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Intel, doesn't seem to have anything illegal. When they asked the attorney back east he said he represented a Person, not a corporation. It is possible he was sent out by a local law firm back there just to make the appearance and he may not have even known. He IS supposed know, but it is not unusual that he didn't, but it sort of doesn't matter any more. That case is over. The patent dispute case is a different case and that is here in California. The only issue now is, is there Patent Infringement. The lawyers who now own the Patent have to prove that Intc infringed upon what ever they have. My best guess is that Intel has about 50 or a 100 of these cases a year for probably the last 15 years or so. If intel feels there is merit in the claim they will settle or intel will win. Good patent attornies are Engineers or scientists and attornies. That seems to be what's happened the last 2 or 3000 times. And I am given to believe that Tom Dunlap knows for sure whether Intel is a corporation or an individual.:)) Duke