Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mooter775 who wrote (15954)	11/11/1999 3:19:00 PM
From: MGV	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Now you are a liar on 3 counts. Great revisionism though - pathlogical revisionism. The wager, which you have ducked and run from, was and is total portfolio return from 11/1/98 to 10/31/99. The amount was $10,000 and with the publication of your returns, if they are truthful, I would be pleased to increase the amount. As before the challenge is to compare documented total return on personal portfolios - i.e. registered under my social security number versus portfolios registered under your social security number. The challenge was made because you made a statement about some stock picks. Apparently you were all noise. The challenge remains. your paragraph 2 is a lie becasue the record shows - and you know it does -that the challenge was at all times specific to the period 11/1/98 to 10/31/99. That is, it was not an open-ended "October to October" of the forward year. The year was specific for a reason. You made a statement about previous picks. I figured if you had any balls with regard to your word, you would accept the challenge. I wasn't surprised when you did not. Your low character is written all over you and your pal eli. "(2) So he responded with a challenge of sorts, ie, to measure investment returns over a year period from the end of October (1998) to the end of October (1999)." The challenge I made remains. Are you going to duck and run again and then try pathological revisionism a week or two later - again?

To: mooter775 who wrote (15954)	11/11/1999 7:25:00 PM
From: Mark Johnson	Respond to of 27311

To Mooter: I've been strolling through the hundred posts today and read your message with interest and decided to respond before I read through the list. It's too bad you have been criticized for you investment strategies, especially from ignorant, deranged, internet wannabes, and that you need to waste your time defending a position that should not have been attacked in the first place. I have purchased and benefited from two stocks you have recommended over the last year. The first was NETE which has gone from 2 7/16 to 44 1/4 this past year and ABMD from 8 to 25 3/4. I sold my NETE far too soon but still have a very small stake in ABMD. Thank you for sharing your investment acumen with this thread. I think I'll hold on to my Valence shares a little longer than I held NETE and ABMD. As a side challenge maybe Larry B. could show us some of his picks....and not rearview picks but something that shows a track record similar to your record. Thanks mooter!! Thanks FMK!!!