Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : EFX - Equifax -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Patriarch who wrote (41)	12/24/1999 2:46:00 PM
From: Jim B	Respond to of 46

guess I found the next stock I'm going short: this company has swindled me They told me a check bounced.. so I sent them the amount PLUS $25.00 in the form of a money order. They cashed it... my financial institution today just confirmed that the original check was also cashed by them. I PAID TWICE!!! I am going to charge them an extra $25.00 now for screwing me over. I make a mistake they charge me.. they make a mistake.. I charge them. However, based on previous experience with Equifax via retail system... I'll be lucky to get my money at all without having to get a lawyer. jim ps.. BE VERY CAREFUL BUYING THIS STOCK :(

To: Patriarch who wrote (41)	1/6/2000 10:55:00 PM
From: Paul Senior	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 46

Stock looks pretty attractive here to me. Starting a small position. Basing my purchase on current stock price in relation to my understanding of the company's past performance record plus a bet that revenues, earnings and dividends can continue to increase in future years. I see the company as having financial information on millions of people - information not easily obtained elsewhere. And a continuing demand by companies and people to access that information for credit decisions and perhaps other reasons. If so, then the company is almost a Warren Buffett type stock- a company having recurring sales with high returns on capital employed and in a business having a high barrier to entry. Anybody else see it that way? Paul Senior