Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jenna who wrote (9959)	11/11/1999 10:12:00 PM
From: zonkie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32883

Since that post was made to me I guess you meant it for me. I read it twice and still don't know why. If it was to me could you tell me what your point is? You seem to me to have the gift of being able to compress the smallest ideas into the longest posts of anyone I know.

To: Jenna who wrote (9959)	11/11/1999 10:20:00 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 32883

Jenna, When A@P was gone SI was replete with boring threads about 'guru mud slinging contests' and otherwise senseless parodies of a true stock thread. Sounds like you were talking about this thread. #reply-11693251 It also looks like you didn't understand the purpose of the thread, nor of the attached message. It may have been boring and senseless, but the point was that threads where people are looking for real information on stocks, like "Market Gems", A@P's threads and "The No Rest for the Wicked" are ruined by the distraction of the gurus clashing. JXM