Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mark Johnson who wrote (15983)	11/12/1999 8:35:00 AM
From: John Curtis	Respond to of 27311

Mark: Yah, I heard that, but I'd already pretty much concluded(from the days of Cal R.) that cobalt was a no go longer term. Too many things against it, not the least of which were the more....uh....explosive considerations Lev mentioned. The other, more basic(as if it could get any more basic than that, eh?) reasons were that cobalt is more expensive, harder to get, and definitely harsh on the 'ol environment(something that businesses/nations/etc. are finally waking up to). So to me cobalt signified a special needs or niche situation only, nothing more. Now let's see how today goes.... Regards! John~